comparison of four gutta-percha filling techniques in simulated C-shaped canals
DOI: 10.1111/iej.12371
Abstract
Aim
To
compare four gutta-percha filling techniques in simulated C-shaped
canals based on filling quality at three cross-sectional levels, filling
time and the apical extrusion of gutta-percha.
Methodology
Forty
resin simulated C-shaped canals were constructed and filled using one
of four techniques; cold lateral compaction (LC), ultrasonic compaction
(UC), single cone with injectable gutta-percha (Obtura II™) (IT) and core-carrier (Thermafil®)
(CC). Cross-sections were made at 1 (L1), 3 (L3), and 6 (L6) mm from
the canal terminus. Areas of gutta-percha, sealer and voids in each
cross-section were measured using an image analysis system. Data were
analysed using a univariate general linear model and post hoc test
(Dunnett's T3). Data of obturation time was evaluated using the
Bonferroni post-hoc test
Results
CC had more gutta-percha and less sealer compared to IT at L1 (P<0 .05="" at="" cc="" em="" gutta-percha="" had="" lc="" less="" level="" marginally="" significantly="" than="" this="">P0>
Conclusion
The core-carrier technique was the most effective technique in the filling of this simulated C-shaped canal.
Comments