The influence of prophylactic antibiotic administration on post-operative morbidity in dental implant surgery. A prospective double blind randomized controlled clinical trial
, , , . The
 influence of prophylactic antibiotic administration on post-operative 
morbidity in dental implant surgery. A prospective double blind 
randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 00, 2013; 1–8. 
Abstract
Objectives
A
 prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted to 
test the effect of prophylactic antibiotics on post-operative morbidity 
and osseointegration of dental implants.
Materials and Methods
Fifty-five
 subjects scheduled for implant surgery were enrolled. The patients were
 randomly assigned to the antibiotic (test group) and placebo (control 
group). Twenty-seven patients (test group) received 3 g amoxicillin one 
hour pre-operatively, and 28 patients (control group) received placebo 
capsules 1 h pre-operatively. No post-operative antibiotics were 
prescribed. Pain diaries and interference with daily activities diaries 
were kept by the patients for 1 week post-operatively. Signs of 
post-operative morbidity (swelling, bruising, suppuration and wound 
dehiscence) were recorded by the principal investigators at day 2 and 
day 7 following the operation. Osseointegration was assessed at 2nd 
stage surgery or 3–4 months post-operatively.
Results
The
 results of this study suggest that the use of prophylactic 
pre-operative antibiotics may result in higher dental implant survival 
rates (100% vs. 82%). Five implant failures, one in each of five 
patients, were reported in the placebo group and none in the antibiotic 
group (P = 0.0515). No significant differences were 
found for most of the signs of post-operative morbidity 2 and 7 days 
post-operatively. Only bruising at 2 days following the operation 
appeared to be higher in the placebo group (P = 0.0511). Post-operative pain (P = 0.01) and interference with daily activities (P = 0.01)
 appeared to be significantly lower for the antibiotic group after 
7 days. Those patients with implant failure reported higher pain (based 
on the VAS scores) after 2 days (P = 0.003) and after 7 days (P = 0.0005), higher pain (based on the amount of analgesics used) after 7 days (P = 0.001) and higher interference with daily activities (based on the VAS scores) after 2 days (P = 0.005).
Conclusions
The
 use of for dental implant surgery may be justified, as it appears to 
improve implant survival in the short term and also results in less 
post-operative pain and interference with daily activities. From the 
results of this study, it appears that prophylactic antibiotics may also
 be beneficial both in terms of implant survival, especially when the 
surgical procedure is prolonged due to its difficulty, high number of 
implants placed or operator's inexperience.
Comments