Research and Education A comparison of the fracture resistance of premolars without a ferrule with different post systems
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Available online 19 November 2019
Abstract
Statement of problem
Which type of post improves the performance of endodontically treated mandibular premolars without a ferrule remains unclear.
Purpose
The
purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the restoration of
endodontically treated mandibular premolars without a ferrule by using
different post systems.
Material and methods
Thirty
extracted mandibular premolars were endodontically treated, and their
crowns removed. They were divided into 3 groups with different post
systems (n=10): zirconia ceramic posts (ZRPs), fiber posts (FPs), and
bundled glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts (GTPs). After post
placement and core fabrication, computer-aided design and computer-aided
manufacture (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate crowns were cemented. The
specimens were subjected to thermocycling and mastication simulation
before a fracture test in a universal testing machine. The maximum load
at which the fracture occurred was recorded, and the fractured specimens
were examined by using an optical microscope. The data were analyzed
for statistical differences with a 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey honestly
significant difference post hoc test (α=.05).
Results
No statistically significant difference in fracture strength was found among the groups (P=.970).
From the light microscopy examination, catastrophic failure was
observed in all specimens, and there was no failure of the ceramic
crowns.
Conclusions
Based
on the findings of this in vitro study, the choice of post material
with a low or high modulus of elasticity did not prevent catastrophic
failures in endodontically treated teeth without a ferrule.
Comments