Determination of nicotine content in teeth submitted to prophylaxis and in-office bleaching by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
Abstract
Objectives
The
objective of this study was to evaluate the dental color exposed to
acute cigarette smoke treatment and quantify the amount of nicotine in
samples exposed to cigarette smoke, after dental prophylaxis and after
in-office bleaching.
Materials and methods
Sixty-nine
healthy human molars were subjected to cigarette smoke in a cigarette
machine. The teeth were divided into three groups: positive control,
prophylaxis, and bleaching. Forty cycles of smoke exposition with
duration of 15 min each were performed using 10 cigarettes (positive
control). Dental prophylaxis was performed with a rotating brush and
prophylaxis paste; in-office bleaching was performed with 35% hydrogen
peroxide, in two sessions of three 15-min applications, with a 1-week
interval between sessions. The color was evaluated at the baseline,
after exposure to cigarette smoke, after dental prophylaxis, and after
in-office bleaching. Teeth from each group were powdered and analyzed by
gas chromatography–mass spectrometry in order to measure the amount of
nicotine present in each group. Data from quantification of nicotine and
color change were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test
(α = 0.05).
Data for subjective and
objective color evaluation, a perceptible dental darkening occurred in
teeth after exposure to cigarette smoke. Dental prophylaxis was able to
recover the original color of teeth however, only after bleaching teeth
became whiter than at the baseline (p < 0.001).
The amount of nicotine was significantly different and higher in
positive control group (3.3 ± 1.3 ÎĽg/g of tooth), followed by the
prophylaxis group (2.1 ± 1.4 ÎĽg/g) and the bleaching group
(0.8 ± 0.3 ÎĽg/g) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Cigarette
smoke penetrates into the dental structure. Dental prophylaxis and
bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide can partially remove the nicotine
from tobacco smoke. However, when in-office bleaching was applied, a
more significant nicotine removal was achieved.
Clinical significance
Dental
prophylaxis could remove most of the external nicotine-staining on the
tooth surfaces while bleaching could further reduce the external and
internal nicotine-staining of teeth.
Comments