Determination of nicotine content in teeth submitted to prophylaxis and in-office bleaching by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
 
    
                            
                        
                    
                    Abstract
Objectives
The
 objective of this study was to evaluate the dental color exposed to 
acute cigarette smoke treatment and quantify the amount of nicotine in 
samples exposed to cigarette smoke, after dental prophylaxis and after 
in-office bleaching.
Materials and methods
Sixty-nine
 healthy human molars were subjected to cigarette smoke in a cigarette 
machine. The teeth were divided into three groups: positive control, 
prophylaxis, and bleaching. Forty cycles of smoke exposition with 
duration of 15 min each were performed using 10 cigarettes (positive 
control). Dental prophylaxis was performed with a rotating brush and 
prophylaxis paste; in-office bleaching was performed with 35% hydrogen 
peroxide, in two sessions of three 15-min applications, with a 1-week 
interval between sessions. The color was evaluated at the baseline, 
after exposure to cigarette smoke, after dental prophylaxis, and after 
in-office bleaching. Teeth from each group were powdered and analyzed by
 gas chromatography–mass spectrometry in order to measure the amount of 
nicotine present in each group. Data from quantification of nicotine and
 color change were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test 
(α = 0.05).
Data for subjective and 
objective color evaluation, a perceptible dental darkening occurred in 
teeth after exposure to cigarette smoke. Dental prophylaxis was able to 
recover the original color of teeth however, only after bleaching teeth 
became whiter than at the baseline (p < 0.001).
 The amount of nicotine was significantly different and higher in 
positive control group (3.3 ± 1.3 ÎĽg/g of tooth), followed by the 
prophylaxis group (2.1 ± 1.4 ÎĽg/g) and the bleaching group 
(0.8 ± 0.3 ÎĽg/g) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Cigarette
 smoke penetrates into the dental structure. Dental prophylaxis and 
bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide can partially remove the nicotine 
from tobacco smoke. However, when in-office bleaching was applied, a 
more significant nicotine removal was achieved.
Clinical significance
Dental
 prophylaxis could remove most of the external nicotine-staining on the 
tooth surfaces while bleaching could further reduce the external and 
internal nicotine-staining of teeth.
Comments