Clinical outcomes following surgical treatment of peri-implantitis at grafted and non-grafted implant sites: a retrospective analysis
Abstract
Background
This retrospective analysis
aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes following combined surgical
therapy of peri-implantitis at initially grafted and non-grafted (i.e.,
pristine) implant sites.
Methods
A total of 39 patients
exhibiting 57 implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis (i.e., 16
implants at grafted and 41 implants at non-grafted sites) were included.
Each subject had received a combined (i.e., implantoplasty and
augmentative therapy) surgical treatment procedures at respective
implants (grafted sites: 10 patients, 16 implants, non-grafted sites: 29
patients, 41 implants). A chi-squared test (χ2) was used to
assess whether the initial grafting procedure did affect the treatment
outcomes (i.e., disease resolution, bleeding on probing (BOP), probing
pocket depths (PD)). The mean follow-up period was 41.9 ± 34.75 months.
Results
At the patient level, disease
resolution (i.e., absence of BOP and PD ≥ 6 mm) was obtained in 4/10
(40%) at grafted and in 7/27 (24.1%) at non-grafted implant sites (p = 0.579). BOP reductions was found to be 60.64 ± 40.81% at non-grafted and 77.45 ± 30.92% at grafted sites (p = 0.778). PD reductions amounted to 2.20 ± 2.22 mm at non-grafted and 1.57 ± 1.54 mm at grafted sites (p = 0.969).
Conclusions
The initial bone-grafting
procedures at the implant sites did not influence the effectiveness of
combined surgical therapy of peri-implantitis.
Comments