YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment
International Endodontic Journal
Abstract
Aim
To assess the content and completeness of Youtube™ as an information source for patients undergoing root canal treatment procedures.
Methodology
YouTube™
(https://www.youtube.com/) was searched for information using three
relevant treatment search-terms (‘endodontics’, ‘root canal’, ‘root
canal treatment’). After exclusions (language, no audio, >15mins,
duplicates), 20 videos per search-term were selected. General video
assessment included duration, ownership, views, age, likes/dislikes,
target-audience and video/audio quality, while content was analyzed
under 6 categories (‘aetiology’, ‘anatomy’, ‘symptoms’, ‘procedure’,
‘postoperative course’, ‘prognosis’). Content was scored for
completeness-level and statistically analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc
Tukey's test (p<0 .05="" p="">0>
Results
To
obtain 60 acceptable videos, 124 were assessed. Depending on the
search-term employed the video content and ownership differed markedly.
There was wide variation in both the number of video views and
‘likes/dislikes’. The average video age was 788 days. In total 46% of
videos were ‘posted’ by a dentist/specialist source; however, this was
search-term specific rising to 70% of uploads for the search
‘endodontic’, while laypersons contributed 18% of uploads for the search
‘root canal treatment’. Every video lacked content in the designated 6
categories, although ‘procedure’ details were covered more frequently
and in better detail than other categories. Videos posted by dental
professional (p=0.046) and commercial sources (p=0.009) were
significantly more complete than videos posted by laypeople.
Conclusions
YouTube™
videos for endodontic search-terms varied significantly by source and
content and were generally incomplete. The danger of patient reliance on
YouTube™ is highlighted, as is the need for endodontic
professionals to play an active role in directing patients towards
alternative high-quality information sources.
Comments