Failure Probability of Three Designs of Zirconia Crowns.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(6):843-9. doi: 10.11607/prd.2448.
Abstract
This
study used a two-parameter Weibull analysis for evaluation of the
lifespan of fully or partially porcelain-/glaze-veneered zirconia crowns
after fatigue test. A sample of 60 first molars were selected and
prepared for full-coverage crowns with three different designs (n = 20):
traditional (crowns with zirconia framework covered with feldspathic
porcelain), modified (crowns partially covered with veneering
porcelain), and monolithic (full-contour zirconia crowns). All specimens
were treated with a glaze layer. Specimens were subjected to mechanical
cycling (100 N, 3 Hz) with a piston with a hemispherical tip (Ø = 6 mm)
until the specimens failed or up to 2 × 10(6) cycles. Every 500,000
cycles, the fatigue tests were interrupted and stereomicroscopy (10×)
was used to inspect the specimens for damage. The authors performed
Weibull analysis of interval data to calculate the number of failures in
each interval. The types and numbers of failures according to the
groups were: cracking (13 traditional, 6 modified) and chipping (4
traditional) of the feldspathic porcelain, followed by delamination (1
traditional) at the veneer/core interface and debonding (2 monolithic)
at the cementation interface. Weibull parameters (β, scale; η, shape),
with a two-sided confidence interval of 95%, were: traditional-1.25 and
0.9 × 10(6) cycles; modified-0.58 and 11.7 × 10(6) cycles; and
monolithic-1.05 and 16.5 × 10(6) cycles. Traditional crowns showed
greater susceptibility to fatigue, the modified group presented higher
propensity to early failures, and the monolithic group showed no
susceptibility to fatigue. The modified and monolithic groups presented
the highest number of crowns with no failures after the fatigue test.
The three crown designs presented significantly different behaviors
under fatigue. The modified and monolithic groups presented less
probability of failure after 2 ×10(6) cycles.
Comments