Clinical efficacy of a computerised device (STA™) and a pressure syringe (VarioJect INTRA ™) for intraligamentary anaesthesia
I use the STA for 99% of my injections. MJ
European Journal of Dental Education
Abstract
Introduction
To
evaluate the impact of experience whilst using different devices for
intraligamentary anaesthesia, dental students tested clinical
anaesthetic efficacy of a mechanical (PDL-S) and a computer-controlled
(CCLAD) application system in restorative patients.
Material and methods
In
a prospective study, 41 Patients in need of restorative treatment in
lower posterior mandible were randomised into three groups (PDL-S: teeth
n = 22; CCLAD: teeth n = 20; inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB): teeth n = 20).
Dental last year students conducted anaesthesia and dental treatment.
Primary objectives were differences in pain during treatment [numeric
rating scale (NRS)] as well as in anaesthetic efficacy
(complete/sufficient vs. insufficient/no effect) between PDL-S and
CCLAD. Pain of injection, need for second injections, amount of
anaesthetic solution and duration of local numbness were assessed. IANB
as gold standard was compared to each system descriptively.
Results
PDL-S had a significant lower pain during treatment (P = 0.017) but a similar anaesthetic efficacy (P = 0.175) compared to the CCLAD system. Concerning pain of injection (P = 0.42), quantity of second injections (P = 0.232), amount of used solution (P = 0.073) as well as duration of local numbness (P = 0.253),
no differences were seen. When comparing both periodontal ligament
injection (PDL)-systems with IANB, pain rating was higher when using
CCLAD. Injection pain, amount of used solution as well as soft tissue
anaesthesia was less for PDL-S and CCLAD.
Discussion
Both
PDL techniques showed a good success for dental routine treatments.
Although, compared to the mechanic device, the CCLAD system might need
more clinical daily experience.
Conclusion
We recommend including specific trainings in intraligamentary anaesthesia in the dental curriculum.
Comments