Dentists treating Tourette syndrome
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
2012;83:e1
doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-303538.24
Abstract
Objective
In contradiction to current neurobiological concepts of Tourette
syndrome (TS) there is a small dental literature suggesting
abnormalities of temporomandibular
joint alignment cause tics via reflexes of the spinal trigeminal
nucleus, without involvement
of the brain. Treatments to correct
this model of pathophysiology by using implants are being offered by
dentists and are
becoming well publicised in the
patient population. No controlled clinical trial data are currently
available. We conducted
a pilot survey of patients and
dentists in the UK to assess the current situation.
Method
Members of the national charity Tourettes Action were contacted to find
out whether they had tried or were considering dental
therapies, and what the effects had
been. A modified self-report version of the Yale Global Tic Severity
Score impairment
subscale was used. Dentists known to
offer the treatment were also asked to complete a questionnaire about
their work.
Results
Nine people who have had the therapy (or their parents) completed the
survey. The majority of respondents were male and aged
under 15 years old and had been
treated in the previous year. Five had pure TS whereas the other four
also had co-morbidities.
All had received a formal diagnosis
from a specialist and four were taking medication. Four people reported
that their dentists
offered a complete cure although
none of the three out of four dentists who responded made this claim. On
average between
2 and 3 visits to the dentist were
required, although one case required 24. None of the dentists discussed
the treatment with
the person's doctor. Two patients
were reasonably happy with the implant (most of the tics disappeared but
some remained),
one person was satisfied
(approximately half of the tics disappeared but the other half
remained), two people were completely
dissatisfied (all of the tics
remained) and the other four reported that it was too early to tell
whether the splint was effective
due to complications. None of the
participants were completely cured or tic-free. The cost ranged from
£3600 to over £10 000.
Conclusion
There is not a sound theoretical basis for dental intervention for TS
and furthermore good clinical evidence to support use
has not been presented. Our small
survey suggests the treatment is less successful than sometimes claimed.
A rigorous clinical
trial is now being planned by the
Tourette Syndrome Association, USA.
Comments