Antimicrobial efficacy of a high-power diode laser, photo-activated disinfection, conventional and sonic activated irrigation during root canal treatment
International Endodontic Journal, 00, 000–000, 2012.
Abstract
Aim
To
evaluate the antimicrobial effect of a diode laser irradiation,
photo-activated disinfection (PAD), conventional and sonic activated
irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on Enterococcus faecalis.
Methodology
Root
canals of 120 human extracted teeth with single straight canals were
prepared with ProTaper files, sterilized, contaminated with an E. faecalis
suspension and incubated for 7 days. They were then randomly
distributed into six groups: G1, diode laser irradiation (2 W,
3 × 20 s); G2, PAD (100 mW, 60 s); G3, PAD with 3D Endoprobe (100 mW,
60 s); G4, 30-gauge syringe irrigation with NaOCl (60 s); G5, sonic
agitation of NaOCl with the EndoActivator system (60 s); G6, 30-gauge
syringe irrigation with NaCl (60 s). The pattern of colonization was
visualized by scanning electron microscopy. The root canals were sampled
by flushing with saline solution at baseline and after the treatments.
The number of bacteria in each canal was determined by plate count. The
presence and the absence of E. faecalis in root canals were also demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Results
There was a significant reduction in the bacterial population after all treatments (P < 0.001).
The PAD, using both laser systems, and the sonic activated NaOCl
irrigation were significantly more effective than diode irradiation and
single NaOCl irrigation in reducing CFUs (P < 0.05). High-power diode laser and single NaOCl irrigation had an equal antibacterial effect (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
The
PAD and EndoActivator system were more successful in reducing the root
canal infection than the diode laser and NaOCl syringe irrigation alone.
Comments