Biofilm accumulation on complete arch subperiosteal implant-supported prostheses: Effect of pontic type

Published:January 16, 2024DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.015

Abstract

Statement of problem

Complete arch subperiosteal implant-supported prostheses present challenges in terms of effective cleaning, leading to the accumulation of biofilm on their intaglio surfaces. The association between different intaglio surface morphologies and biofilm accumulation on complete arch subperiosteal implant-supported prostheses is unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the correlation between the intaglio surface of complete arch subperiosteal implant-supported prostheses and biofilm accumulation.

Material and methods

Sixty-eight complete arch subperiosteal implant-supported prostheses were fabricated with varying interimplant distances and pontic morphologies. Four different types of pontic morphologies were included: saddle, flat, scalloped, and ovate. To simulate biofilm accumulation, a green aerosol was sprayed onto the intaglio surface. Dental floss was used to clean the colored spray from the intaglio surface. The intaglio surfaces of prostheses were then scanned with an intraoral scanner. The biofilm areas were identified and calculated by using a 3-dimensional macroscopical quantification method. The distances between adjacent implants and transmucosal height were measured. The correlation between interimplant distances and biofilm areas, and the correlation between the biofilm areas and transmucosal height, were analyzed using the Spearman test. Furthermore, a generalized estimating equation (GEE) was employed to examine the relationship between pontic morphology and biofilm area, adjusting for location, cantilever, implant distance, and transmucosal height (α=.05).

Results

A significant correlation was found between the biofilm area and transmucosal height (correlation coefficient=0.208, P<.001). A significant increase in biofilm accumulation was observed in the saddle group compared with the 3 groups in GEE Models I and II.

Conclusions

Flat pontics and ovate pontics have significantly lower biofilm retention. Moreover, transmucosal height plays a significant role in biofilm accumulation in the pontic area.