Mechanical behavior of endocrowns fabricated with different CAD-CAM ceramic systems
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Available online 10 February 2020
Abstract
Statement of problem
The mechanical behavior of ceramic endocrowns is unclear.
Purpose
The
purpose of this in vitro and 3-dimensional finite element analysis
(3D-FEA) study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of endodontically
treated teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns made by using different
computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)
systems.
Material and methods
Sixty
mandibular human molars were endodontically treated, prepared for
endocrowns, and divided into 4 groups (n=15) according to the following
various ceramic systems: leucite-based glass ceramic (LC group), lithium
disilicate-based glass ceramic (LD group), glass ceramic based on
zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (LSZ group), and monolithic
zirconia (ZR group). After adhesive bonding, the specimens were
subjected to thermomechanical loading and then to fracture resistance
testing in a universal testing machine. The failure mode of the
specimens was qualitatively evaluated. Three-dimensional FEA was
performed to evaluate the stress distribution in each group. Data were
analyzed by using a 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05).
Results
Statistically significant differences among the groups were observed (P<.05).
The outcomes of the LC, LD, and LSZ groups were similar (1178 N, 1935
N, and 1859 N) but different from those of the ZR group (6333 N). The LC
and LD groups had a higher ratio of restorable failures, while LSZ and
ZR had more nonrestorable failures. Fractographic analysis indicated a
regular failure pattern in the ZR group and irregular failure patterns
in the other groups. Three-dimensional FEA revealed similar values and
stress pattern distributions among the groups.
Conclusions
The
mechanical performance of monolithic zirconia was better than that of
the other ceramic endocrowns considered in this research; however,
monolithic zirconia presented a higher rate of catastrophic tooth
structure failure.
Comments