Research and Education Loss of tooth structure associated with preparation for two monolithic CAD-CAM complete coverage restorations
Volume 120, Issue 3, September 2018, Pages 403-408
Abstract
Statement of problem
Different
techniques are used to fabricate complete coverage restorations. Each
fabrication technique requires a specific preparation design that may
violate a principle of tooth preparation, that is, conservation of tooth structure.
Purpose
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the volume of loss of mandibular first molar structure associated with a preparation for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) versus conventionally fabricated complete coverage restorations.
Materials and methods
Fifty
artificial mandibular right first molars were weighed before and after
preparation for complete coverage restorations of the following types:
complete cast, monolithic zirconia, monolithic pressed lithium
disilicate, monolithic milled lithium disilicate, and metal-ceramic
crowns (n=10 per method). Tooth mass loss was measured by subtracting
the mass after preparation from the mass before the preparation, and
tooth volume loss was calculated by dividing the mass by the density of
the material. A robust analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc test, was used to compare the volume of tooth loss (α=.01).
Results
Mean tooth volume losses were 255.6 mm3, 270.0 mm3, 312.7 mm3, 331.7 mm3, and 309.9 mm3
for complete cast, monolithic zirconia, monolithic pressed lithium
disilicate, monolithic milled lithium disilicate, and metal-ceramic
crowns, respectively. Teeth prepared for monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia and
lithium disilicate crowns did not exhibit a significantly lower (P>.01) decrease in volume loss than with complete cast and monolithic pressed lithium crowns.
Conclusions
Preparation
of teeth for monolithic CAD-CAM complete coverage restorations is not
associated with a significantly higher volume of tooth loss than their
conventionally fabricated counterpart preparations.
Comments