Impact of cross-sectional root canal shape on filled canal volume and remaining root filling material after retreatment
Abstract
, . Impact of cross-sectional root canal shape on filled canal volume and remaining root filling material after retreatment. International Endodontic Journal. 
Aim
To
 assess the impact of cross-sectional root canal shape (CSRCS) on the 
canal volume that can be filled and the root filling material that 
remains following a subsequent retreatment procedure.
Methodology
A
 total of 15 extracted two-rooted human maxillary premolars and 15 
mandibular first molars were used. Both root canals in the premolars (N = 30) and the distal root canal in the molars (N = 15)
 were prepared using ProFile instruments and filled by lateral 
compaction using gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. Canals were later 
retreated using the last ProFile used for instrumentation followed by 
two ProFiles of increasing size. Teeth were viewed in a μCT 
scanner before and after each treatment step. Defined and validated 
threshold levels were used to differentiate empty root canal volumes, 
root dentine and root filling materials from each other. CSRCS was 
defined as the averaged ratio between bucco-lingual and mesio-distal 
canal diameter (round ≤ 1, oval 1–2, long oval 2–4 and flattened ≥ 4), 
determined for each 1 mm over the total root length. Data were averaged 
between the two canals in premolars, only the distal canals were 
assessed in molars. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to 
statistically compare the data, alpha = 0.01.
Results
Canals
 in premolars had a round CSRCS after preparation (1.0 ± 0.0), whereas 
distal counterparts in molars were oval (1.6 ± 0.5). Significantly (P < 0.01)
 more canal volume could be filled, and significantly less filling 
material remained after retreatment in premolars compared with 
mandibular molar distal canals. There was a high correlation between 
CSRCS, filled canal volume and remaining filling material.
Conclusions
The endodontic procedures under investigation were significantly influenced by the cross-sectional root canal shape.
Comments