Family history and oral health: findings from the Dunedin Study
Did we really need a study to validate what most dentists know? MJ
Shearer, D. M., Thomson, W. M., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Broadbent, J. M. and Poulton, R. (2011), Family history and oral health: findings from the Dunedin Study. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00641.
Abstract – Context: The effects of the oral health status of one generation on that of the next within families are unclear.
Shearer, D. M., Thomson, W. M., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Broadbent, J. M. and Poulton, R. (2011), Family history and oral health: findings from the Dunedin Study. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00641.
Abstract – Context: The effects of the oral health status of one generation on that of the next within families are unclear.
Objectives: To determine whether parental oral health history is a risk factor for oral disease.
Methods:
Oral examination and interview data were collected during the age-32
assessments in the Dunedin Study. Parental data were also collected on
this occasion. The sample was divided into two familial-risk groups for
caries/tooth loss (high risk and low risk) based on parents’
self-reported history of tooth loss at the age-32 assessment interview.
Main outcome measures: Probands’ dental caries and tooth loss status at age 32, together with lifelong dental caries trajectory (age 5–32).
Results:
Caries/tooth loss risk analysis was conducted for 640 proband-parent
groups. Reference groups were the low-familial-risk groups. After
controlling for confounding factors (sex, episodic use of dental
services, socio-economic status and plaque trajectory), the prevalence
ratio (PR) for having lost 1+ teeth by age 32 for the high-familial-risk
group was 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05, 1.88] and the rate
ratio for DMFS at age 32 was 1.41 (95% CI 1.24, 1.60). In the
high-familial-risk group, the PR of following a high caries trajectory
was 2.05 (95% CI 1.37, 3.06). Associations were strongest when
information was available about both parents’ oral health. Nonetheless,
when information was available for one parent only, associations were
significant for some outcomes.
Conclusions:
People with poor oral health tend to have parents with poor oral
health. Family/parental history of oral health is a valid representation
of the intricacies of the shared genetic and environmental factors that
contribute to an individual’s oral health status. Associations are
strongest when data from both parents can be obtained.
Comments