Use of narrow-diameter implants in the posterior segments of the jaws: A retrospective observational study of 2 to 11 years

 The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 

Published:February 18, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.017

Abstract

Statement of problem

The placement of narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) in the posterior region is still debated in view of the high biomechanical risks in these areas.

Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate the success and survival rates of NDIs restored with fixed prostheses in the posterior region (primary outcome) and analyze whether splinting multiple units (prosthesis design) affects the biological and mechanical complications (secondary outcome).

Material and methods

Dental records from 2 private clinics were reviewed for NDIs in the posterior region installed between 2009 and 2018. Ninety study participants (58 women and 32 men) aged between 21 and 84 years (mean age 49.9 years) were recalled for the assessment of implant survival and success of 160 NDIs previously provided for partial posterior edentulism associated with moderate horizontal bone loss or reduced interradicular space (105 premolars and 55 molars). The implants were restored with metal-ceramic single crowns or splinted multiple-unit prostheses, either screw-retained or cemented on customized (n=100) or stock titanium abutments (n=60). Peri-implant probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), bone quality, type of edentulism, and patient satisfaction were scored. The chi-square test for independence and 2-sample Welch t test were performed for statistical analysis (α=.05).

Results

The overall success rate was 89.37%. One implant had been removed 4 years after loading, another after 9 years, yielding a cumulative survival rate of 98.75%. Fourteen implants exhibited PPD > 5 mm. One implant and 1 abutment screw fractured, and 16 restorations demonstrated porcelain chipping. The chi-square test showed no significant relationship between prosthetic design and complications whether biological (P=.087) or mechanical (P=.805). Eighty-two percent of patients were satisfied with esthetics, 76% with function, 85% with total duration of treatment, and 90% with overall treatment cost.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this retrospective study, NDIs may be considered a reliable option to replace posterior teeth. The prosthetic design had no significant impact on biological or mechanical complications.