Can 3D imaging and digital software increase the ability to predict dental arch form after orthodontic treatment?
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume 156, Issue 6, December 2019, Pages 870-877
Highlights
- •
 - Software analysis of scanned 3D cast helped predict posttreatment dental arch form.
 - •
 - Clinicians predict posttreatment dental arch form better by using digital software.
 - •
 - The software improved agreement between the primary and final wire forms.
 - •
 - The software omitted human visual errors and increased agreement between clinicians.
 - •
 - Dental arch form changes were not highly predictable during treatment.
 
Introduction
This
 study aimed to evaluate the ability of dental clinicians to predict 
posttreatment dental arch forms in patients with malocclusion with the 
aid of 3D imaging and digital software in comparison with a conventional
 method.
Methods
Pretreatment
 and posttreatment dental plaster casts of 100 patients (200 maxillary 
models and 200 mandibular models) were selected. Three orthodontists 
selected the best-fitted archwires among 5 commercially available 
preformed nickel-titanium archwires using 2 methods. In the conventional
 method, they fit the archwires to pretreatment casts, and in the 
digital method, they fit the scanned wire to a 3D digital model, using 
Ortho-Aid, a locally developed 3D software, using clinical bracket 
points as reference for wire fitness. The predicted posttreatment 
archwire in each method was compared with the best-fit archwire on the 
actual posttreatment model of each patient in both methods, and the 
level of agreement was calculated. The interobserver agreement between 
the 3 orthodontists in each method was evaluated using intraclass 
correlation coefficient and the Dahlberg formula.
Results
Orthodontists
 predicted the final treatment outcome in 50% of cases using the 
conventional method and 58% using the digital method. However, the range
 of method error was significantly higher in the conventional method 
(0.425-3.853 mm for the conventional vs 0.451-0.584 mm for the digital).
Conclusions
Although
 the clinicians' ability to predict the final dental arch form after 
orthodontic treatment and the agreement between clinicians increased by 
the use of digital equipment, orthodontists can predict the final arch 
form in about 60% of patients.

Comments