Can 3D imaging and digital software increase the ability to predict dental arch form after orthodontic treatment?
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume 156, Issue 6, December 2019, Pages 870-877
Highlights
- •
- Software analysis of scanned 3D cast helped predict posttreatment dental arch form.
- •
- Clinicians predict posttreatment dental arch form better by using digital software.
- •
- The software improved agreement between the primary and final wire forms.
- •
- The software omitted human visual errors and increased agreement between clinicians.
- •
- Dental arch form changes were not highly predictable during treatment.
Introduction
This
study aimed to evaluate the ability of dental clinicians to predict
posttreatment dental arch forms in patients with malocclusion with the
aid of 3D imaging and digital software in comparison with a conventional
method.
Methods
Pretreatment
and posttreatment dental plaster casts of 100 patients (200 maxillary
models and 200 mandibular models) were selected. Three orthodontists
selected the best-fitted archwires among 5 commercially available
preformed nickel-titanium archwires using 2 methods. In the conventional
method, they fit the archwires to pretreatment casts, and in the
digital method, they fit the scanned wire to a 3D digital model, using
Ortho-Aid, a locally developed 3D software, using clinical bracket
points as reference for wire fitness. The predicted posttreatment
archwire in each method was compared with the best-fit archwire on the
actual posttreatment model of each patient in both methods, and the
level of agreement was calculated. The interobserver agreement between
the 3 orthodontists in each method was evaluated using intraclass
correlation coefficient and the Dahlberg formula.
Results
Orthodontists
predicted the final treatment outcome in 50% of cases using the
conventional method and 58% using the digital method. However, the range
of method error was significantly higher in the conventional method
(0.425-3.853 mm for the conventional vs 0.451-0.584 mm for the digital).
Conclusions
Although
the clinicians' ability to predict the final dental arch form after
orthodontic treatment and the agreement between clinicians increased by
the use of digital equipment, orthodontists can predict the final arch
form in about 60% of patients.
Comments