Objective
To test the effects of different adhesive protocols and silane application on the
adhesive durability to a Lithium Disilicate reinforced glass ceramic.
Methods
Forty disks of 13 mm diameter (E.max Press) were used. After etching with 9.5% HF
for 20 seconds, disks were randomly assigned into 4 groups according to the adhesive/silane
protocol: silane application only (SIL); silane application followed by adhesive (SILXP—XP
Bond); silane‐containing adhesive (SBU—ScotchBond Universal); silane application followed
by silane‐containing adhesive (SILSBU). Four resin composite cylinders of 1‐mm diameter
and 3‐mm height were made on each ceramic disk and tested in shear. Specimens were
stored in water for 24 hours or 12 months prior to testing. Results were statistically
analyzed by two‐way ANOVA and Tukey test.
Results
After 24 hours, the highest SBS values were observed for SILXP and SILSBU. However,
after 12 months, SILXP and SILSBU presented a significant reduction in SBS, while
the highest SBS were observed for SIL. For SBU, no significant reduction in SBS was
observed, however, it showed the lowest SBS after 12 months.
Conclusions
Regardless of the presence of silane in the composition of SBU, previous silane application
is still recommended prior to cementation of Lithium Disilicate.
Clinical Significance
The application of silane as a separate step is recommended prior to cementation of
Lithium Disilicate reinforced glass‐ceramic, independent of the presence of silane
within the universal adhesive solution.
Comments