Effect of acidity of in-office bleaching gels on tooth sensitivity and whitening: a two-center double-blind randomized clinical trial
Clinical Oral Investigations
Abstract
Objectives
The
study aimed to compare the tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching
efficacy of two hydrogen peroxide gels with different pHs (acid pH [Pola
Office, SDI] and the neutral pH [Pola Office+, SDI]) used for in-office
bleaching.
Materials and methods
Fifty-four
patients from Brazil and Chile, with right superior incisor darker than
A2, were selected for this double-blind, split-mouth randomized trial.
Teeth were bleached in two sessions, with 1-week interval. Each session
had three applications of 8 min each, according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. The color changes were evaluated by subjective (Vita
Classical and Vita Bleachedguide) and objective (Easy shade
spectrophotometer) methods. Participants recorded TS with 0–10 visual
analog scale. Color change in shade guide units (SGU) and ΔE was analyzed by Student’s t test (α = 0.05). The absolute risk and intensity of TS were evaluated by McNemar’s test and Wilcoxon-paired test, respectively (α = 0.05).
Results
All
groups achieved the same level of whitening after 30 days of clinical
evaluation. The use of a neutral in-office bleaching gel significantly
decreases the absolute risk of TS (28%, 95% CI 18–41) and intensity of
TS when compared to the acid bleaching gel (absolute risk of 50%, 95% CI
37–63).
Conclusion
The
use of a neutral in-office bleaching agent gel produced the same
whitening degree than an acid bleaching gel but with reduced risk and
intensity of tooth sensitivity.
Clinical significance
Clinicians
should opt to use in-office bleaching with a neutral gel than an acid
product because the former causes a significant lower risk and intensity
of tooth sensitivity.
Comments