Interventions for replacing missing teeth: antibiotics at  dental implant placement to prevent complications.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,  School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge  Street, Manchester, UK, M15 6FH.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some dental implant  failures may be due to bacterial contamination at implant insertion.  Infections around biomaterials are difficult to treat and almost all  infected implants have to be removed. In general, antibiotic prophylaxis  in surgery is only indicated for patients at risk of infectious  endocarditis, for patients with reduced host-response, when surgery is  performed in infected sites, in cases of extensive and prolonged  surgical interventions and when large foreign materials are implanted.  To minimise infections after dental implant placement various  prophylactic systemic antibiotic regimens have been suggested. More  recent protocols recommended short term prophylaxis, if antibiotics have  to be used. With the administration of antibiotics adverse events may  occur, ranging from diarrhoea to life-threatening allergic reactions.  Another major concern associated with the widespread use of antibiotics  is the selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The use of  prophylactic antibiotics in implant dentistry is controversial.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial or harmful effects of systemic  prophylactic antibiotics at dental implant placement versus no  antibiotic/placebo administration and, if antibiotics are of benefit, to  find which type, dosage and duration is the most effective. SEARCH  STRATEGY: The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane  Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE  were searched up to 2nd June 2010. Several dental journals were  handsearched. There were no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA:  Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with a follow up of at  least 3 months comparing the administration of various prophylactic  antibiotic regimens versus no antibiotics to patients undergoing dental  implant placement. Outcome measures were prosthesis failures, implant  failures, postoperative infections and adverse events (gastrointestinal,  hypersensitivity, etc). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Screening of  eligible studies, assessment of the methodological quality of the trials  and data extraction were conducted in duplicate and independently by  two review authors. Results were expressed as random-effects models  using risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence  intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was to be investigated including both  clinical and methodological factors. MAIN RESULTS: Four RCTs were  identified: three comparing 2 g of preoperative amoxicillin versus  placebo (927 patients) and the other comparing 1 g of preoperative  amoxicillin plus 500 mg 4 times a day for 2 days versus no antibiotics  (80 patients). The meta-analyses of the four trials showed a  statistically significant higher number of patients experiencing implant  failures in the group not receiving antibiotics: RR = 0.40 (95% CI 0.19  to 0.84). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one patient  having an implant failure is 33 (95% CI 17 to 100), based on a patient  implant failure rate of 5% in patients not receiving antibiotics. The  other outcomes were not statistically significant, and only two minor  adverse events were recorded, one in the placebo group. AUTHORS'  CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence suggesting that 2 g of amoxicillin  given orally 1 hour preoperatively significantly reduce failures of  dental implants placed in ordinary conditions. No significant adverse  events were reported. It might be sensible to suggest the use of a  single dose of 2 g prophylactic amoxicillin prior to dental implant  placement. It is still unknown whether postoperative antibiotics are  beneficial, and which is the most effective antibiotic.
 
Comments