Abstract   
The  Nd:YAG laser has been used since 1970 in dental  laboratories to weld  metals on dental prostheses. Recently in several              clinical cases, we have suggested that the Nd:YAG laser   device commonly utilized in the dental office could be used to repair              broken fixed, removable and orthodontic prostheses and to   weld metals directly in the mouth. The aim of this work was to evaluate,              using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive   X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA),              the quality of the weld and its mechanical strength,  comparing a  device normally used in dental laboratory and a device  normally              used in the dental office for oral surgery, the same as that   described for intraoral welding. Metal plates of a Co-Cr-Mo dental              alloy and steel orthodontic wires were subjected to four  welding  procedures: welding without filler metal using the laboratory              laser, welding with filler metal using the laboratory laser,  welding  without filler metal using the office laser, and welding              with filler metal using the office laser. The welded  materials were  then analysed by SEM, EDS and DMA. SEM analysis did not             show  significant differences between the samples although  the plates welded  using the office laser without filler metal showed             a  greater number of fissures than the other samples. EDS  microanalysis of  the welding zone showed a homogeneous composition             of the  metals. Mechanical tests showed similar elastic  behaviours of the  samples, with minimal differences between the samples             welded  with the two devices. No wire broke even under the  maximum force  applied by the analyser. This study seems to demonstrate              that the welds produced using the office Nd:YAG laser device  and the  laboratory Nd:YAG laser device, as analysed by SEM, EDS             and  DMA, showed minimal and nonsignificant differences,  although these  findings need to be confirmed using a greater number             of  samples.            |  
 | 
Comments