Worldwide assessment of the root and root canal characteristics of maxillary premolars – a multi-center CBCT cross-sectional study with meta-analysis
Published:October 26, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.10.009
Highlights
- •26,400 maxillary premolars from 44 countries were analyzed regarding their root and root canal morphologies;
- •Prevalence of multiple canals was 93.5% for the 1st premolar and 49.7% for the 2nd premolar;
- •Global percentages of 3-rooted configuration was 1.8% and 0.4% for the 1st and 2nd premolars, respectively;
- •Asians had the lowest proportions of roots and root canals, while Europeans and Africans had the highest;
- •Males, older patients and 1st premolars tend to present a higher prevalence of multiple canal morphology;
- •Tooth position, voxel size, and field-of-view had no influence on the outcomes.
Abstract
Introduction
This worldwide study examined the root and root canal characteristics of maxillary
premolars and explored how demographic factors impact the outcomes.
Methods
Observers from 44 countries assessed 26,400 maxillary premolars using cone-beam computed
tomography and employed a standardized screening method to gather data on multiple
canal morphology and 3-rooted configuration (primary outcomes), as well as secondary
outcomes related to root and root canal anatomies. Demographic factors such as ethnicity,
sex, and age were collected for each participant. The intra- and inter-observer tests
ensured observer reliability. Primary outcomes were represented as odds ratios and
untransformed proportions accompanied by 95% confidence interval (CI) forest plots.
Meta-analysis compared sub-groups and identified sources of heterogeneity (α=5%).
Results
The overall prevalence of multiple canal morphology in the first premolar was 93.5%
(95% CI, 93.3%-94.7%), while in the second premolar, it was 49.7% (95% CI, 44.9%-54.6%).
The proportion of 3-rooted configuration was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.1%) in the first
premolar and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.3%-0.5%) in the second. Asian countries generally displayed
fewer roots and root canals, while European nations showed higher counts (P<0.05).
Males exhibited higher percentages and odds ratios for both outcomes in both premolars.
Younger patients demonstrated lower percentages of multiple root canal morphologies
(P<0.05). Factors such as tooth side, voxel size and field-of-view did not influence
the outcomes (P>0.05).
Conclusions
The worldwide assessment of root and root canal characteristics of maxillary premolars
has revealed a discernible influence of various factors such as tooth type, geographical
region, ethnicity, sex, and age.
Comments