Root Canal Disinfection by Single- and Multiple-instrument Systems: Effects of Sodium Hypochlorite Volume, Concentration, and Retention Time

Journal Of Endodntics
Publication History
Published online: April 10, 2019

Highlights

  • Bacterial reduction was compared between a single-file and a multifile system.
  • All protocols produced a highly significant intracanal bacterial reduction.
  • Counts of bacteria were 2.5 times significantly higher in the REC-2.5LOW group when compared with the BR-2.5HI group.
  • Disinfection was better with multiple instruments, high volume, and longer sodium hypochlorite exposure.

Abstract

Introduction

This ex vivo study evaluated the intracanal bacterial reduction promoted by chemomechanical preparation using a single-file technique varying the volume, concentration, and retention time of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation in comparison with a multifile system.

Methods

Palatal roots from extracted maxillary first molars were selected and anatomically matched based on microcomputed tomographic analysis for group distribution. The canals were contaminated with a fresh mixed bacterial culture grown in anaerobiosis and recently obtained from a tooth with apical periodontitis. Specimens were divided into 4 groups of 24 each according to the following preparation protocols: REC-6LOW (Reciproc R50 instrument [VDW, Munich, Germany], 6% NaOCl, low irrigant volume), REC-2.5LOW (R50, 2.5% NaOCl, low irrigant volume), REC-2.5HI (R50, 2.5% NaOCl, high irrigant volume), and BR-2.5HI (BioRaCe [FKG Dentaire, LaChaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland], 2.5% NaOCl, high irrigant volume). The total time of preparation was recorded. Intracanal bacteriologic samples were taken before and after preparation; DNA was extracted and subjected to quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Bacteria were detected in 22 initial samples from the REC-2.5LOW group and in 23 from the other groups. Intragroup analysis showed that all tested preparation protocols were highly effective in significantly reducing the intracanal bacterial counts (P < .001). Intergroup comparison of bacterial reduction levels revealed a statistically significant difference between BR-2.5HI and REC-2.5LOW (P < .05). Counts of bacteria were 2.5 times significantly higher in REC-2.5LOW compared with BR-2.5HI. No other significant differences were found in quantitative findings (P > .05).

Conclusions

The concerted effects of multiple instruments, the high volume of irrigation, and the long retention time of NaOCl irrigant had a positive influence on intracanal disinfection during chemomechanical preparation.

Comments