Root Canal Disinfection by Single- and Multiple-instrument Systems: Effects of Sodium Hypochlorite Volume, Concentration, and Retention Time
Journal Of Endodntics
Publication History
Published online: April 10, 2019
Publication History
Published online: April 10, 2019
Highlights
- •Bacterial reduction was compared between a single-file and a multifile system.
- •All protocols produced a highly significant intracanal bacterial reduction.
- •Counts of bacteria were 2.5 times significantly higher in the REC-2.5LOW group when compared with the BR-2.5HI group.
- •Disinfection was better with multiple instruments, high volume, and longer sodium hypochlorite exposure.
Abstract
Introduction
This ex vivo
study evaluated the intracanal bacterial reduction promoted by
chemomechanical preparation using a single-file technique varying the
volume, concentration, and retention time of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)
irrigation in comparison with a multifile system.
Methods
Palatal
roots from extracted maxillary first molars were selected and
anatomically matched based on microcomputed tomographic analysis for
group distribution. The canals were contaminated with a fresh mixed
bacterial culture grown in anaerobiosis and recently obtained from a
tooth with apical periodontitis. Specimens were divided into 4 groups of
24 each according to the following preparation protocols: REC-6LOW
(Reciproc R50 instrument [VDW, Munich, Germany], 6% NaOCl, low irrigant
volume), REC-2.5LOW (R50, 2.5% NaOCl, low irrigant volume), REC-2.5HI
(R50, 2.5% NaOCl, high irrigant volume), and BR-2.5HI (BioRaCe [FKG
Dentaire, LaChaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland], 2.5% NaOCl, high irrigant
volume). The total time of preparation was recorded. Intracanal
bacteriologic samples were taken before and after preparation; DNA was
extracted and subjected to quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Results
Bacteria
were detected in 22 initial samples from the REC-2.5LOW group and in 23
from the other groups. Intragroup analysis showed that all tested
preparation protocols were highly effective in significantly reducing
the intracanal bacterial counts (P < .001). Intergroup
comparison of bacterial reduction levels revealed a statistically
significant difference between BR-2.5HI and REC-2.5LOW (P <
.05). Counts of bacteria were 2.5 times significantly higher in
REC-2.5LOW compared with BR-2.5HI. No other significant differences were
found in quantitative findings (P > .05).
Conclusions
The
concerted effects of multiple instruments, the high volume of
irrigation, and the long retention time of NaOCl irrigant had a positive
influence on intracanal disinfection during chemomechanical
preparation.
Comments