Zirconia abutments in the anterior region: A systematic review of mechanical and esthetic outcomes
Abstract
Statement of problem
The
success of single, anterior, implant-supported restorations relies on
mechanical and esthetic outcomes. Titanium has been the most commonly
used material for abutments, but zirconia is increasingly chosen for its
appearance despite its unclear mechanical performance. Today,
manufacturers market prefabricated, computer-aided design and
computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) custom and zirconia abutments
with titanium connections.
Purpose
The
purpose of this study was to systematically review the mechanical and
esthetic outcomes of implant zirconia abutments used in the anterior
region, considering the design changes of the past 5 years.
Material and methods
An
electronic search was conducted in Medline (PubMed) for studies on
zirconia abutments. All clinical studies with at least a 1-year
follow-up and case series (>5 abutments) published after 2013 were
included. Mechanical and esthetic outcomes were collected.
Results
Of
the 231 retrieved studies, 20 remained for quantitative analysis.
Twelve described mechanical outcomes, and 15 focused on esthetics, using
mainly the pink esthetic score. Five articles reported abutment
fractures and no chipping. No difference was found between prefabricated
and custom abutments or internal and external implant connections
regarding fractures or screw loosening. All authors reported “good to
excellent” esthetic integration in terms of restorations and soft-tissue
color and the presence and height of papillae. The most difficult
esthetic parameters to achieve were root convexity, soft-tissue color,
and texture and level of mucosa.
Conclusions
Esthetics
remain the major advantage of zirconia abutment when compared with
titanium, despite reservations concerning the risk of mechanical
complications. Data are lacking for zirconia abutments with titanium
inserts, although the prospects for this design are promising.
Comments