CS 3600 Intraoral Scanner Outperforms Other Scanners, Traditional Impression, in Finish Line Accuracy
ATLANTA—Since its launch in 2016, the accuracy of Carestream Dental’s CS 3600 intraoral scanner has been consistently confirmed
by international third-party scientific research. Now, the scanner has
once again been recognized for its outstanding performance in finish
line accuracy.
“Finish Line Distinctness and Accuracy in 7 Intraoral Scanners versus Conventional Impression: An In-vitro Descriptive Comparison,”*
published in BMC Oral Health, aims to highlight differences, if any, in
finish line distinctness and finish line accuracy among seven intraoral
scanners and one traditional impression.
The
study defines finish line distinctness as “the degree of visual clarity
and identifiability in the reproduction of the finish line compared to a
reference scan,” and finish line accuracy (FLA) as “the ability of a
measurement to match the actual value of a reference scan in the
immediate proximity to the finish line.” In this case, a model with a screw
retained crown and a preparation for a cemented crown was scanned with a
highly accurate industrial scanner to act as the reference scan.
One
traditional impression was taken of the base model while each of the
seven scanners captured 10 digital impressions each on the model; the
tenth scan from each scanner was used to evaluate finish line
distinctness and accuracy.
Based
on “color deviation evaluation and distribution of deviations in
histogram,” the CS 3600 shared the top rank among the scanners for
highest finish line accuracy, with a deviation below ±25 μm. The study
also stated the CS 3600 showed a clear and distinct color rendering,
which the researchers purposed may “assist in identifying the finish
line compared to the monochromatic .STL files.”
Also,
while the CS 3600 consistently ranked higher in both finish line
accuracy and distinctness than the traditional impression, that was not
true for all scanners tested.
“In
modern dentistry, we assume that digital will naturally give us better
results than analog,” Ed Shellard, D.M.D., chief dental officer,
Carestream Dental said. “However, this study shows that not all scanners
are created equal when it comes to providing better results than
traditional impressions.”
Ultimately,
the study states that there are “sizeable variations between intraoral
scanners with both higher and lower finish line distinctness and finish
line accuracy than impressions” and encourages clinicians to “critically
evaluate [a] digital impression, being aware of technical limitations
and system specific variations among intraoral scanners.”
To
learn more about the CS 3600 intraoral scanner, or any other of
Carestream Dental’s innovative solutions, please contact 800.944.6365 or visit carestreamdental.com.
*Nedelcu R, Nystrom I, Olsson P, Thor A. Feb. 26, 2018. Finish Line Distinctness and Accuracy in 7 Intraoral Scanners versus Conventional Impression: An In-vitro Descriptive Comparison. BMC Oral Health.18(27): DOI 10.1186/s12903-018-0489-3
*Nedelcu R, Nystrom I, Olsson P, Thor A. Feb. 26, 2018. Finish Line Distinctness and Accuracy in 7 Intraoral Scanners versus Conventional Impression: An In-vitro Descriptive Comparison. BMC Oral Health.18(27): DOI 10.1186/s12903-018-0489-3
XXX
About Carestream DentalCarestream Dental provides industry-leading dental digital product lines and services, including imaging equipment, CAD/CAM systems, software and practice management solutions, for dental and oral health professionals. With more than 100 years of industry experience, Carestream Dental technology captures two billion images annually and aids in more precise diagnoses, improved workflows and superior patient care. For more information or to contact a Carestream Dental representative, please call 800.944.6365 or visit carestreamdental.com.
Follow Carestream Dental online:
Comments