A novel non-surgical method for mild peri-implantitis- a multicenter consecutive case series
International Journal of Implant Dentistry20173:38
©  The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 April 2017
Accepted: 13 July 2017
Published: 3 August 2017
Abstract
Aim
The aim of the present study 
was to evaluate the effect on peri-implant mucosal inflammation from the
 use of a novel instrument made of chitosan in the non-surgical 
treatment of mild peri-implantitis across several clinical centers.
Materials and methods
In this 6-month multicenter 
prospective consecutive case series performed in six different 
periodontal specialist clinics, 63 implants in 63 patients were finally 
included. The subjects had mild peri-implantitis defined as radiographic
 bone loss of 1–2 mm, pocket probing depth (PPD) ≥4 mm and a positive 
bleeding on probing (mBoP) score. The patients were clinically examined 
at baseline and after 2, 4, 12 and 24 weeks, and radiographs were taken 
at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. Treatment of the implants with the 
chitosan brush seated in an oscillating dental drill piece was performed
 at baseline and at 3 months. Reductions in the clinical parameters (PPD
 and mBoP) were compared between baseline and the later examination time
 points.
Results
Significant reductions in both PPD and mBoP were observed at all time points compared with the baseline clinical measurements (p < 0.001).
 The mean PPD and mBoP at baseline were 5.15 mm (4.97; 5.32) and 1.86 
(1.78; 1.93), respectively, whereas the mean PPD and mBoP at 6 months 
were 4.0 mm (3.91; 4.19) and 0.64 (0.54; 0.75), respectively. Stable 
reductions in PPD and mBoP were evident up to 6 months after the initial
 treatment and 3 months after the second treatment. All 63 implants were
 reported to have stable radiographic levels of osseous support.
Conclusions
This case series demonstrated 
that an oscillating chitosan brush is safe to use and seems to have 
merits in the non-surgical treatment of dental implants with mild 
peri-implantitis. To measure the effectiveness of the method, a 
multicenter randomized clinical trial needs to be undertaken.
Comments