Dental Materials
Volume 28, Issue 10 , Pages e250-e258, October 2012
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of the work was to
assess the influence of coping and veneer thickness on the fracture
resistance of porcelain–metal and porcelain–zirconia crowns in a
clinically representative model.
Methods
A total of 30 zirconia and 30 precious metal copings were fabricated. There were 10 copings in each group of 0.5

mm, 1

mm and 1.5

mm
thickness. Each group of 10 was further divided into two groups with a
total thickness of three and four millimeters inclusive of veneering
ceramic. The specimens were cemented to a titanium abutment with zinc
oxide cement and tested using a microindenter. Crack length, hardness
and spalling (chipping) were recorded using an optical microscope from
which fracture toughness was calculated.
Results
Kruskal–Wallis
tests and simple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the
results, revealing a significant difference between zirconia (ZrCC) and
metal (MCC) specimens for crack length. 0.5

mm
coping thicknesses and MCC specimens showed the highest fracture
toughness values. Simple linear regression analysis showed a limited
effect of the overall thickness or veneer thickness on crack length and
hardness; however coping thickness showed a positive correlation with
both. Spalling was higher in zirconia specimens.
Residual stresses
were higher for ZrCC specimens and showed a positive correlation with
crack length. The ratio of veneer to coping thickness was negatively
correlated with residual stress.
Significance
Residual
stresses due to thermal mismatch between the coping and the veneering
ceramic should be kept to a minimum. The ZrCC specimens were found to
have lower apparent fracture toughness than MCC specimens. Thermal
mismatch caused a larger drop in apparent fracture toughness than the
inherent differences in the materials used.
No comments:
Post a Comment